Hey @Copilot 👋 — thanks for picking up the Audits category routing task from issue #44063! Standardizing create-discussion configs across the audit/analysis report workflows is exactly the right kind of corpus-hygiene fix.

This PR was just opened and currently has 0 changed files, so a few things to address once the implementation lands:

• Add a description — once the workflow config edits are in, update the PR body to list which workflows were changed and what create-discussion field was updated (e.g. category: Audits). Reviewers need to know which workflows were touched without diffing manually.
• Add tests or validation — if any of the affected workflows have test fixtures, snapshot files, or schema-validation steps, include coverage for the category field change. Even a note explaining why no tests apply would help reviewers.

If you'd like a hand finishing this up, you can assign this prompt to your coding agent:

Complete the implementation for PR #44092 in github/gh-aw.

Goal: standardize all agentic audit/analysis report workflows (e.g. repository-quality, security-observability, geo-optimizer, terminal-stylist) to post discussions into the "Audits" category by updating their `create-discussion` config field.

Steps:
1. Search for all workflow YAML files under .github/workflows/ that include a `create-discussion` step or config block.
2. For each file that is an audit/analysis report workflow but does NOT already set `category: Audits` (or equivalent), update it to do so.
3. Update the PR body with a summary of which files were changed and what field was updated.
4. If test fixtures or schema snapshots exist for these workflows, update them to reflect the new category value.

Generated by ✅ Contribution Check · 122 AIC · ⌖ 17.8 AIC · ⊞ 6.2K · ◷

🤖 Triage Assessment

Summary: Routes pdf-summary discussions to Audits category. Draft. Small config change (+7/−6, 2 files). No CI triggered.

Next: Convert to ready-for-review when tested.

Generated by 🔧 PR Triage Agent · 97.9 AIC · ⌖ 12.4 AIC · ⊞ 5.4K · ◷